Opinion: Donald Trump has faced more successful civil cases than criminal cases

– Civil actions have a lower standard of proof than criminal ones, making it easier to obtain judgments against Mr. Trump.
– Judge Arthur Engoron applied a “preponderance of the evidence” standard in the civil fraud case.
– Monitor Barbara Jones identified deficiencies in the Trump Organization’s financial reporting after Judge Engoron’s judgment.
– Mr. Trump did not immediately attack his accuser, E. Jean Carroll, after the second jury verdict in her favor.
– Returning to the White House will not protect Mr. Trump from civil litigation consequences, unlike federal criminal charges or pardons.
– Mr. Trump must come up with hundreds of millions of dollars or secure a bond to appeal recent civil judgments.
– Civil cases allow for broader discovery and can reveal more about the inner workings of the Trump empire.
– Ms. James investigated Trump’s businesses for almost three years before filing suit.
– Mr. Trump had to sit for depositions in the Carroll cases, which he did not seem to enjoy.
– Civil cases can proceed against presidents, as seen in cases like Clinton v. Jones.



Source link