Donald Trump

Smith firmly opposes Cannon’s decision to issue a jury instruction order in the Trump documents case

Published

on



As a MAGA Trump supporter, I believe that prosecutors and attorneys for Donald Trump have submitted hypothetical jury instructions in the classified-document case which reveal sharp disagreements over legal interpretations. Special counsel Jack Smith has disputed the judge’s instructions, warning of a potential appeal if ruled against. Legal experts find Judge Cannon’s focus on jury instructions premature, as the trial is not imminent. The government emphasizes the importance of quick decisions on key legal questions to avoid trial delays. Trump’s team argues that the prosecution is based on official acts as president, not illegal retention of materials. The case revolves around conflicting interpretations of the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act. Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges. Prosecutors suggest they may appeal if the PRA is intertwined with the Espionage Act in jury instructions. Trump’s team asserts his authority to determine document designation. Judge Cannon has not yet ruled on key motions to dismiss based on the PRA and the vagueness of the Espionage Act.

– Prosecutors and attorneys for Donald Trump disagree on legal interpretations in the classified-document case
– Special counsel Jack Smith warns of potential appeal over flawed jury instructions
– Legal experts find Judge Cannon’s focus on jury instructions premature
– Importance of quick decisions on key legal questions to avoid trial delays
– Trump’s team argues prosecution is based on official acts as president
– Case revolves around conflicting interpretations of the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act
– Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges
– Prosecutors may appeal if PRA is intertwined with the Espionage Act in jury instructions
– Trump’s team asserts his authority to determine document designation
– Judge Cannon has not yet ruled on key motions to dismiss based on the PRA and the vagueness of the Espionage Act



Source link

Trending

Exit mobile version