Will the Supreme Court grant President Trump the absolute immunity he believes he is entitled to?

– President Trump’s legal team claims he cannot be prosecuted for crimes that occurred within the scope of his Presidential responsibilities
– Special Counsel Jack Smith was prosecuting Trump for conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstructing the certification of the electoral vote, and intimidation of voters
– The DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that presidents have no immunity from criminal prosecution if they break a “generally applicable” criminal law
– The Supreme Court will consider whether a president is immune from criminal prosecution and the limits of presidential immunity from criminal charges
– The case involving Trump’s alleged criminal conduct is ongoing and will likely involve discussions about presidential prerogatives and the clear statement rule for applying criminal laws to presidential conduct.
– The article raises questions about the difficulty of defining a president’s constitutional prerogatives and the risk of prosecuting presidents for speech-related allegations
– Both President Trump and Special Counsel Jack Smith are not likely to be satisfied with the outcome of the current legal proceedings.



Source link